- International
Atomic Energy Agency
- 51st
General Conference,
Vienna
,
19th September 2007
- Statement
by Dr. Anil Kakodkar,
- Chairman,
Atomic Energy Commission and Leader of the Indian Delegation
Mr.
President,
Let me first of all congratulate you on behalf of my Government and on my
own behalf, on your election as President of the 51st General
Conference. I am sure, under your
able Presidentship and with the support of your team and the Secretariat of the
Agency; this General Conference will
be able to accomplish the tasks before it.
I also take this opportunity to welcome the entry of
Kingdom
of
Bahrain
,
Republic
of
Burundi
,
Nepal
,
Republic
of
Congo
and
Republic
of
Cape Verde
to the membership of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Over
the past half century, the growth of the Agency and
India
’s nuclear energy programmes have evolved side by side. The Agency has
contributed immensely to harness the benefits of nuclear energy and its
applications for all mankind.
India
, home to a sixth of global population with a sound and time-tested philosophy
of life, too has evolved its own nuclear technological capability, realised on
the basis of self-reliant domestic development for the welfare of its people.
Our Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Training School which has provided
almost the entire human resource for our nuclear programme has also completed
fifty glorious years and our Prime Minister was with us only a fortnight ago for
the graduation function of its 50th batch.
On the occasion of its 50th
anniversary, it is gratifying to recognise the unique place that the IAEA has
within the UN system. The prestige, credibility and authority of IAEA in this
new century rests to a very good measure on the consistent good work done by its
Secretariat under the wise leadership
of Dr El Baradei especially for the past critical decade. My delegation would
like to pay handsome tributes to the Director General and the dedicated staff of
IAEA for their professionalism, impartiality and core competence in serving the
Member States in accordance with the Statute of the Agency. IAEA’s
achievements in the past half century have much to contribute to rekindled hopes
for a peaceful atom in coming years.
Mr. President,
The
world today is at the threshold of a paradigm shift.
There is greater awareness today than ever before about the serious
consequences to humanity as a whole
arising out of the threat to global climate which seems to be at the cliff edge.
This situation has come about as a result of unmindful and unsustainable
use of fossil energy by a small fraction of world population in industrially
advanced societies. On the other
hand, a larger part of world population is now on a rapid economic development
path. It would require enormous
amounts of energy resources to bridge the deficit between the emerging demand
and current supply which is very low in the developing world even compared to
global average per capita energy consumption.
It seems impossible to sustain a tension-free society with 20 or 30 times
less per capita energy access in the current interdependent world so closely
connected through modern-day communications.
It is estimated that meeting development aspirations of these large
populations which are now well capable of buying their necessities would raise
serious energy sustainability issues and consequent escalation of fuel prices
that would affect us all. One needs
to look at nuclear energy in this context. Energy
associated with processes involving the nucleus of an atom is several
million-fold higher than the energy associated with processes that involve
electrons that orbit around the nucleus. The
latter forms the basis of energy through burning of fossil fuels.
Thus, a kilogram of uranium can be a source of a million times more
energy as compared to a kilogram of coal or a kilogram of hydrocarbons.
Non-emission of greenhouse gases that have threatened the global climate
is also a feature of nuclear energy that is catching the imagination of even
some of those who earlier opposed it. As
a matter of fact, nuclear energy released through fission or fusion of atomic
nuclei and solar energy that we receive from the sun are the only two viable
basic energy sources capable of meeting our long-term energy needs.
We also cannot escape the fact that the sun derives its energy from
nuclear fusion. There is, however, a
serious fear of the unknown. Such concerns are natural and have been faced by
humankind whenever there has been
a paradigm shift in things
around it. Whether it is in learning
to live with fire or advancing from horse carriages to locomotives and
automobiles, man has gone through similar dilemmas.
But eventually, he has mastered the new technology and accessed its
benefits, overcoming the fear of the unknown.
In the absence of such foresight and conviction, we could not have made
progress. In the case of nuclear
energy we are, however, talking on an altogether different scale.
Given the population pressure and the need to provide a good quality of
life to all, we must evolve ourselves as a society that can benefit from this
high-intensity energy source without the risk of its misuse.
Mr.
President
,
India
with its one
billion plus aspiring population and one trillion dollar economy with steady 8%
plus GNP growth requires enormous amounts of sustained and reliable energy
supply. It is estimated that
India
would need around 7000 TWh of electricity annually and an additional and larger
quantum of primary energy to meet requirements of fossil fluid fuel replacement.
While accessing this huge energy
supply is a major challenge, we are also fully conscious of the environmental
impact of such growth in energy use particularly if it takes place in the
business-as-usual mode. In this
context, I would like to draw your attention to what our Prime Minister said at
the recent Heiligendamm meeting and I quote, “
India
’s GHG emissions are among the lowest in per-capita terms.
Moreover, being only around 4% of the world’s emissions, action by us
will have a marginal effect on overall emissions.
Nonetheless, we recognize wholeheartedly our responsibilities as a
developing country. We wish to
engage constructively and productively with the international community and to
add our weight to global efforts to preserve and protect the environment.
We are determined that
India
’s per-capita GHG emissions are not going to exceed those of developed
countries even while pursuing policies of development and economic growth.
We must work together to find pragmatic, practical solutions, which are
for the benefit of entire human kind”. unquote
Mr.
President
,
India
has been
pursuing its robust three stage nuclear programme designed to maximize the
energy potential from its domestic uranium and thorium resources and
contribute around 25% share of electricity generation in the country by the year
2050. The objective is to
realize the huge energy potential that is realizable from these nuclear energy
resources without having to add to the global carbondioxide burden.
The programme is moving ahead steadily with the
first
stage consisting of indigenously developed Pressurised Heavy Water Reactors (PHWRs)
well into a commercially successful programme.
The second stage has commenced with the construction of 500 MWe Prototype
Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR) which is now fairly advanced. The third stage is
about to begin with the start of construction of a technology demonstrator, the
300 MWe Advanced Heavy Water Reactor (AHWR).
The three stages are being implemented sequentially to reach the goal of
large scale thorium utilization and are linked through their respective fuel
cycles which are also well underway.
Kaiga-3 (a 220 MWe PHWR) which achieved its
first
criticality on 26th February, 2007 within 5 years from the
first
pour of concrete, was synchronized to the grid on 11th April, 2007
and started commercial operations on 6th May, 2007.
With completion of Kaiga-3, there are now 17 nuclear power reactors in
operation, the total installed capacity being 4120 MWe.
The Indian nuclear power sector has achieved over 270 reactor years of
safe, accident free operations. Major
Ageing Management activities including Enmasse Coolant Channel Replacement (EMCCR)
were completed in NAPS-1 and the reactor is expected to come back on-line
shortly. With this, four PHWRs
(RAPS-2, MAPS-1&2, NAPS-1) now have their coolant channels replaced.
The first cycle of Peer-reviews of all the operating stations by WANO has
been completed. RAPP-5 unit has also
undergone a Pre-Startup Peer Review by an expert team of WANO.
This was the second review of its kind in
India
; after TAPP-3 which was reviewed last year.
The next Biennial General Meeting (BGM) of WANO will be hosted by
India
, in 2010 at
New Delhi
.
Construction activities are underway in full swing at six other reactors
– three PHWRs, two LWRs and a 500 MWe PFBR.
Of these, two reactors (RAPP-5 and Kaiga-4) would see start of fuel
loading during the year. On
completion of the reactors currently under construction, there will be 23
reactors in operation with installed capacity of 7280 MWe.
The detailed design and engineering of the indigenous 700 MWe PHWR is
progressing according to the set time schedule.
The Government has given in-principle approval for setting-up of 4x700
MWe PHWRs at two sites and 4x1000 MWe LWRs at another two sites in the country.
Establishment of a new Uranium mine and mill at Tummelepalle has also
been approved by the Government.
For accelerating the growth of the fast reactors in the country,
development of metallic fuel, which would offer high breeding capabilities is
being carried out on priority with the aim of its deployment around the year
2020. The next four fast reactors
after the PFBR, which are proposed to be commissioned by 2020 will however,
continue to use oxide fuel. These future reactors will incorporate refinements
in the design and construction, to achieve reduction in capital as well as
operational costs, on the basis of experience with the PFBR. The objective is to
bring down the unit energy cost substantially
as compared to PFBR. Enhancement
of the burn-up of the fuel from the present target of 100 GWd/t to 200 GWd/t is
recognized as an important step for reduction in the fuel cycle cost.
Towards achieving this target, the development of advanced cladding and
structural materials including the oxide dispersion strengthened alloy have been
initiated. The expertise generated
and the experience gained in this development process will be further harnessed
for developing structural materials for the Test Blanket Module being developed
by the
Institute
of
Plasma Research
as part of the fusion energy programme.
Towards closing the fuel cycle of PFBR, a fast reactor fuel cycle
facility (FRFCF) has been planned with its construction to commence next year.
The facility is expected to be operational, in time to process the
irradiated fuel discharged from the PFBR. The
production of the mixed oxide fuel for PFBR has already commenced.
I had mentioned in my last year’s address in this Conference about
excellent performance of our indigenously designed mixed carbide fuel for FBTR
and about our successful reprocessing of the high burn-up carbide fuel from FBTR
after a short cooling period. I am
happy to inform that fissile material recovered from reprocessing has now been
fabricated into mixed carbide fuel. This fuel will be loaded into FBTR during
the next reload schedule. Closing
the mixed carbide fuel cycle has been an important milestone for us in our fuel
cycle activities related to fast reactor program.
I may also add here that we are now operating FBTR with an expanded
hybrid core consisting of mixed carbide and mixed oxide fuel.
The high Pu MOX now forms about 20% of the FBTR core.
Mr. President,
We are looking forward to the possibility of opening up of international
civil nuclear cooperation. We expect
such cooperation to be sustainable, free from interruptions and consistent with
our national policy of closed fuel cycle. With
a view to significantly augment nuclear power generation capacity in the
near-term through imports, as an additionality to the ongoing indigenous
programme, a Site Selection Committee has evaluated coastal sites in the country
for the reactors to be set up in a convoy mode.
The initiatives also open up the possibility of export of reactors and
services.
India
today is the only country to have a live technology, design and infrastructure
for small PHWRs with a unit capacity of 220 MWe, which have a great potential
for export, particularly to countries with small grids wishing to enter nuclear
power generation, with relatively modest investments and infrastructure.
Given the large manufacturing base and relatively low manufacturing
costs, there is also a potential for
India
becoming a manufacturing hub for equipment and components for the global
nuclear industry.
We have been actively pursuing the design and development of Advanced
Heavy Water Reactor which will mainly use thorium based fuel and has several
advanced safety features. In fact,
this reactor would meet the objectives of a futuristic system that would have to
meet higher safety, economics, sustainability, long term radioactive waste
minimisation and proliferation resistance goals.
Pre-licensing safety appraisal of this first-of-a-kind design was
completed by the Indian Atomic Energy Regulatory Board. A large Critical
Facility for validating reactor physics design of the
unique core of the AHWR is under commissioning at BARC.
We expect this facility to provide important data that would further
improve our understanding of the thorium based reactors.
In the Compact High Temperature Reactor (CHTR) being designed in
India
, it will be possible to extend the core life up to a period of fifteen years.
A liquid metal natural circulation loop employing Lead Bismuth Eutectic
alloy as the coolant has been installed to study the CHTR behaviour.
Parallely, designs of 600 MWt High Temperature Reactor (HTR) for hydrogen
production and 5 MWt Multi-purpose Nuclear Power Pack (MNPP) are also currently
underway.
India
has been exploiting research reactors for basic research, neuron radiography,
shielding experiments, testing of reactor components including neutron
detectors, trace element analysis, etc. We
are currently planning to construct a 30 MWt Multi Purpose Research Reactor (MPRR)
capable of providing a maximum thermal neutron flux of 6.7 x 1014
n/cm2/sec and fast neutron flux of 1.7 x 1014 n/cm2/sec.
The new reactor will meet the increasing requirements of high specific activity
radio-isotopes and would also provide enhanced facilities for basic research in
frontier areas of science and for applied research related to development and
testing of nuclear fuel and reactor materials.
Further, the reactor will have features to enable its conversion to an
Accelerator Driven System at a later date.
The superconducting heavy ion LINAC project has reached a major milestone
in July, 2007 with all seven accelerator modules energized to accelerate 28Si
beam to an energy of 209 MeV, highest achieved so far in the country.
We have indigenously developed another supercomputer named ANUPAM-AJEYA
which has attained a sustained speed of 3.70 Teraflops, twice that of the speed
of its earlier version ANUPAM-AMEYA system.
The new system comprises 256 dual-core, dual CPU computing nodes, each
processor running at 2.66 GHZ with 4 GByte of main memory.
The system will be upgraded shortly to achieve speed exceeding 4
Teraflops.
Our contributions in the area of nuclear agriculture, biology and health
have always been significant. As of
now, 29 crop varieties have been gazette notified by the Ministry of
Agriculture, Government of India for commercial cultivation in the country.
For processing of biodegradable waste, 14 indigenously developed
Nisargruna biogas plants have been set up in the country so far.
On
April 26, 2007
, KRUSHAK Irradiator at Lasalgaon in the State of
Maharashtra
became the
first
Cobalt-60 gamma irradiation facility to be certified by the United States
Department of Agriculture-Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service
(USDA-APHIS) for phytosanitary treatment of mangoes.
Consequently, this year, the facility enabled export of 157 tons of
mangoes, mainly of Alphonso and Kesar varieties, to the
United States of America
, after a gap of 18 years.
As in the past, we have been closely interacting with the Agency
as partners in development.
India
was one of the founder members and a strong supporter of INPRO.
We have noted with great satisfaction the progress made in this important
activity of the Agency. In
particular, the recent step to initiate, under Phase-2 of INPRO, several
collaborative projects under Joint Initiative mode has a great potential to
facilitate cost effective development of solutions relevant for global
deployment of next generation advanced nuclear energy systems. We
once again stress the need to provide full budgetary support to the INPRO
activities, recognizing its immense potential to lead to global enhancement in
the availability of safe and economical nuclear energy to meet the future
demands.
In the area of Nuclear Security & Physical protection,
India
along with IAEA has been organizing workshops/training courses for the Asia
& Pacific region and serves as Regional Resource Centre.
So far, we have conducted four Regional Training Courses on Physical
Protection of Nuclear installations and also a Regional Training Course on the
Physical Protection of Radioactive Sources.
In addition, we have conducted Regional Training Courses on Advanced
Detection Equipment and on Response to criminal or unauthorized acts involving
nuclear or other radioactive material and also a Regulatory Authority
Information System (RAIS) Training Course. We are about to deposit our
instrument of ratification to the amendment to the CPPNM.
Mr. President,
Global nuclear energy renaissance which has become a necessity and
appears to be well on cards, however, rests today on a very fragile foundation.
We need to build robust inclusive partnerships on an objective, reliable
and predictable basis with a holistic mutual understanding and trust.
The need to adopt fuel recycle to maximize energy availability makes it
even more necessary. We are all
justifiably concerned about the risks related to safety, environment and
proliferation arising out of irresponsible behaviour of state and non-state
actors. However, we need to be even
more concerned about the vastly enhanced security risk to which future
generations would be exposed as a result of direct disposal of spent fuel
leading to plutonium mines when a large part of radioactivity decays.
There are, thus, risks and challenges. But they are within the
professional competence of nuclear energy community. A judicious combination of
technology and institutional control with every responsible partner being a part
of the solution, rather than being seen as a problem, can in fact provide the
answer.
Thank
you, Mr. President
----------------